A Controlled LLM Workflow for Evidence-Grounded Diagnosis of Risk Score Differences
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.23962v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose a controlled Large Language Model (LLM) workflow for explaining risk score differences using similar historical transactions. The workflow combines reference retrieval and contrastive SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) evidence with reference-based LLM reasoning and deterministic validation. Experiments on a test dataset show that the workflow produces more consistent, evidence-grounded and traceable diagnoses than the same LLM without structured workflow guidance.
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- Ex-DeepMind researcher Thore Graepel launches new startup Metis ReasoningSifted · October 20, 2026
- Beyond Explicit Intent: Discovering and Shaping Artistic Intent through Human-AI Co-CreationarXiv cs.AI · October 20, 2026
- Self-Improving Video-to-Action ModelsarXiv cs.AI · October 20, 2026
- LogicVal:A Logic-Formalized Benchmark for Constraint Satisfaction in Text-to-Image GenerationarXiv cs.AI · October 20, 2026
- Training-Free Prompt Selection for Efficient Reinforcement Learning With Partial RolloutsarXiv cs.AI · October 20, 2026
- Cache2LoRA: Understanding and Improving Context InternalizationarXiv cs.AI · October 20, 2026