A decodability criterion predicts when hidden-state selection beats majority voting in large language models
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2608.17124v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Combining the answers a large language model (LLM) samples for a question into one decision is a test-time information fusion problem, usually solved by majority voting. Voting is unreliable on difficult questions, where the sampled answers share correlated errors, so the wrong answer can win and drawing more samples makes the decision worse. Selecting a candidate by reading a correctness signal from the model's hidden states is a promising alternative, but its accuracy varies across models and tasks, and no measure indicates when it can be trusted. In this paper, we propose CASE (Correctness-Axis SElection), a dynamic selection combiner that t
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- Depth Enables Local Entropy: Quadratic Depth Dependence in Deep Variation-Norm ReLU RegressionarXiv cs.AI · August 19, 2026
- Do LLMs Know a Good Hypothesis When They See One? Logit-Based Energy Scoring Outperforms Prompted LLM-as-Judge for Scientific Hypothesis RankingarXiv cs.AI · August 19, 2026
- KernelArc: A Multi-Agent Framework for GPU Kernel OptimizationarXiv cs.AI · August 19, 2026
- Synthesizing Feature Extractors: An Agentic Approach for Algorithm SelectionarXiv cs.AI · August 19, 2026
- PlanPO: Group Planning-Aware Policy Optimization for Multi-Turn Agentic LLMsarXiv cs.AI · August 19, 2026
- SkillEffect: Checked Lowering for Memory-Bounded Agent ToolsarXiv cs.AI · August 19, 2026