A Polyphonic Conception of AI Understanding
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2609.36079v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When a doctor, a judge, or an engineer must decide whether to trust an AI model's output, they cannot avoid asking what the model understands. Purely mathematical or statistical descriptions struggle to distinguish trustworthy from untrustworthy outputs without reintroducing the question of AI understanding in all but name. Yet the question is ill-framed as it stands, because the inherited concept operates within a monophonic paradigm: the idea that a cognitive system's understanding of something must be localised to a single mechanism underpinning all the capacities conferred by such understanding. Drawing on a wide range of mechanistic eviden
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- Chinese firms trail global peers on profits, but AI power boom offers bright spot: NatixisSCMP Tech · September 30, 2026
- More Features Are Not More Evidence: Limits of Training-Free Human Activity Recognition with JevarXiv cs.AI · September 30, 2026
- Towards Mitigating Deceptive Safety Alignment in Large Reasoning ModelsarXiv cs.AI · September 30, 2026
- GeoOutageBench: Benchmarking Ambiguity-aware, Ontology-grounded Geospatiotemporal KGQA for Multimodal Power Outage and Resilience AnalysisarXiv cs.AI · September 30, 2026
- The Layer Mystery of VLA: An Information-Theoretical Analysis of VLA Latent InterfacearXiv cs.AI · September 30, 2026
- An Empirical Study and Assessment of EU AI Act Compliance CheckersarXiv cs.AI · September 30, 2026