A Synthetic Ground-Truth Framework for the Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2609.30397v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods is a challenging task due to the lack of reliable evaluation procedures and, in particular, the absence of ground truth explanations. In the literature, existing evaluation approaches typically assess explanations by measuring their fidelity with respect to the predictions of a black-box model. However, such evaluation strategies only quantify the degree to which an explanation reproduces the model's output, without ensuring that the explanation correctly reflects the underlying decision process. As a consequence, different explanations may achieve similar fidelity scores while provid
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- xAI
- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Företag
Related AI news
- As China mulls how to make open-weight AI less dangerous, report proposes 6-stage processSCMP Tech · September 28, 2026
- Xiaomi-backed robotics chip designer clears hearing, eyes US$100m Hong Kong IPO: sourcesSCMP Tech · September 28, 2026
- Montag: OpenAI-Pause beim KI-Training, Werkstattbesuche nach VW-Schraubenproblemheise online – KI · September 28, 2026
- L’immobilier face au « tsunami » de l’intelligence artificielleLe Monde Pixels · September 28, 2026
- Bringing AI to Autonomous Systems -- From Cognition to Collective IntelligencearXiv cs.AI · September 28, 2026
- Bridging LLM Agents and Data Spaces: An Architectural Mediation Approach using the Model Context ProtocolarXiv cs.AI · September 28, 2026