AGORA: Reliability-Aware Aggregation of LLM Judges via Item-Response Theory
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2611.05556v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-as-a-judge is a common substitute for costly human evaluation, and aggregating several judges is the standard remedy for any single judge's bias. Judge pools mix judges of very different reliability, while the human-labeled sets that validate them hold a few hundred items or fewer. In this regime the per-item mean weights weak judges as heavily as strong ones, and confusion-table models such as Dawid-Skene must estimate a per-judge error table from too few items. We propose AGORA (Aggregation Of Reliability-weighted Assessments), an item-response-theory aggregator that places every item on one latent quality scale and describes each judge b
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Företag
Related AI news
- Indian Institute of Science venom drug startup raises $2.7mTech in Asia · November 5, 2026
- SlackBench: Benchmarking Agents on Collaborative Projects Grounded in Real Code RepositoriesarXiv cs.AI · November 5, 2026
- Who May Overrule the Agent? Evidence-Gated Authority in LLM Review InstitutionsarXiv cs.AI · November 5, 2026
- Verified but Vacuous: Three Failure Surfaces of LLM-Driven Verified Code GenerationarXiv cs.AI · November 5, 2026
- Agent Harness Awareness: Turning Verified Telemetry into Operational Control for Tool-Using AgentsarXiv cs.AI · November 5, 2026
- A Feasibility Condition for Confidence-Gated Tiered LLM InferencearXiv cs.AI · November 5, 2026