Auditing Pairwise Equivalence Judgments: Self-Critique Effects and Diversity Measurement in Multi-Agent Hypothesis Generation
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.04133v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent systems built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to scientific discovery and hypothesis generation. Both the effect of refinement and the diversity of the delivered set are hard to interpret before experimental ground truth exists, and both are typically reported by deciding whether pairs of generated hypotheses describe the same underlying mechanism. We study two evaluation questions that rest on this pairwise equivalence judgment: (1) how much self-critique changes delivered hypotheses beyond run-to-run variability, and (2) how the equivalence rule used to group hypotheses affects measured diversity. Across f
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
- Företag
Related AI news
- Huawei's Kirin 9050 Pro reveals new logic folding chip designDIGITIMES · October 6, 2026
- Exclusive: Hadrian raises $40m as AI cyberattacks accelerateSifted · October 6, 2026
- Training Numerical Intelligence via Auto-Diagnosis and Skill DiscoveryarXiv cs.AI · October 6, 2026
- CUAWright: A Minimal Unified Interface for Digital AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 6, 2026
- InvestigationWorlds: An Agentic Environment for Legal InvestigationarXiv cs.AI · October 6, 2026
- Agentic Cognitive Depth: Operational Criteria for Evaluating LLM AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 6, 2026