Beyond Symmetric Agents: Cognitive Diversity and Multi-Agent Debate in Small Language Models
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2609.35875v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent debate (MAD) reportedly improves reasoning and factuality over single-model inference, but prior work treats agents as symmetric peers, leaving open what drives the gains. We test the hypothesis that cognitive diversity among agents is the driver, in the setting where the question is still measurable: small open-weight models with benchmark headroom. Across 23 models from eleven vendor families, five tasks, and 5,500+ debate and control runs, we vary diversity along three axes - personas, sampling temperature, and model identity - pairing every debate configuration with a generation-budget-matched majority-vote control. The hypothes
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- Risk-Averse Online POMDP Planning via CVaR of the Immediate Cost with Performance GuaranteesarXiv cs.AI · September 30, 2026
- OpenAI-HuggingFace: A Reproduction & Lessons for Alignment TestingarXiv cs.AI · September 30, 2026
- Neurosymbolic Routing for Reliable Reasoning on Resource-Constrained Edge DevicesarXiv cs.AI · September 30, 2026
- More Programs or More Rolls? Separating Coverage from Specialization in LLM HarnessesarXiv cs.AI · September 30, 2026
- Representational Simplicity and Circuit Size Dissociate in a Threshold-Dependent Way: A Controlled Test via Adversarial TrainingarXiv cs.AI · September 30, 2026
- Grab a Coffee: Future-Aware Guidance for Discrete Diffusion with Compiled ObjectivesarXiv cs.AI · September 30, 2026