CEMIR vs. FISER: a comparative study of reasoning-based and enrichment-based approaches to pragmatic intent recognition
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2610.32022v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Intent recognition in human-robot interaction requires agents to resolve ambiguous natural language instructions by inferring the speaker's underlying goals. Research has increasingly focused on two notable paradigms for addressing this task: structured symbolic reasoning and multimodal input enrichment. However, it remains unclear whether enrichment-based methods provide benefit in settings where the ambiguity concerns unstated human intent rather than missing observable scene information. In this paper, we present a comparative and diagnostic study benchmarking FISER - a framework utilizing structured social and embodied reasoning - against C
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
- Robotik
Related AI news
- Exclusive: Monzo founder Tom Blomfield backs AI agent startup Nous in $17m raiseSifted · October 26, 2026
- HSBC launches AI tool for corporate banking clientsTech in Asia · October 26, 2026
- A look at Toyota's robotics expansion, including its Walden spinoff and a $6.4B annual plan to deploy 400K factory robots, as it competes with Tesla and China (Financial Times)Techmeme · October 26, 2026
- Reproducible Evaluation as the Substrate for Safe Prompt Compression in Production AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026
- PaperFormalizer: Author-in-the-Loop Autoformalization of Research Papers in LeanarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026
- Don't Forget What You Just Learned: Self-Directed Repair Turns Agent Mistakes Into Lasting LessonsarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026