Closed-World Resolution Against Tool Hallucination in LLM Agents
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2609.19425v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tool-augmented large language model (LLM) agents fail in a way no tool-selection or tool-security method addresses: they call tools that do not exist and pass arguments no schema declares. Existing defenses either pick the right tool (selection) or constrain what an agent may do with real tools (gating), both of which presuppose the emitted call refers to a real tool at all. We show this is a structural blind spot: a hallucinated call is by construction not a decision any gate made, so no gate can reject it. This paper is primarily a measurement and benchmark study. We give a five-class taxonomy of tool hallucination (H1-H5) and, as a reference
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- AWS, Salesforce expand AI and zero-copy integrationsTech in Asia · September 18, 2026
- Security researchers in an OpenAI bug bounty program hacked OpenAI, accessing its "monorepo" on GitHub, using a cybersecurity version of Opus 4.8 and Opus 5 (Robert McMillan/Wall Street Journal)Techmeme · September 18, 2026
- Five breaches by AI agents over the past yearEconomic Times Tech · September 18, 2026
- Freitag: Meta-Haftung für Nutzerbetrug, Googles KI-Agent für das Familienlebenheise online – KI · September 18, 2026
- Zero trust har ett stort AI-problemComputer Sweden · September 18, 2026
- What Do Current Systematic Generalization Tasks Miss? A Reasoning-Centered AnalysisarXiv cs.AI · September 18, 2026