Consensus Within, Competition Between: Decentralized LLM Teams for Perimeter Defense
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.41044v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The use of large language models (LLMs) to coordinate multi-agent teams raises a fundamental architectural question: whether task allocation should be centralized in a single LLM controller or distributed across autonomous LLM agents, particularly when communication is unreliable. In a deliberately simplified perimeter-defense simulation against LLM-controlled intruders, we compared a central commander, an auction-based consensus team and independent agents under five network conditions. Breach rates were 15% for the consensus team, 32% for the commander and 29% for independent agents, and of the different network conditions, only limited radio
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Agenter
- Företag
Related AI news
- SemiAnalysis launches GDPx, an agentic capability benchmark measuring 11 domains, including chip design, cybersecurity, and RSI; Opus 5.5 tops with a 12% score (SemiAnalysis)Techmeme · November 2, 2026
- CIRCE Divines LLM Task Complexity from Constraint StructurearXiv cs.AI · November 2, 2026
- Verifying Text-to-SQL Queries under Changing Business SemanticsarXiv cs.AI · November 2, 2026
- Does Recursive Knowledge Construction Help Agents Verify Consensus Claims in Science?arXiv cs.AI · November 2, 2026
- Nedimo: An Evidence-Grounded Multilingual Pipeline for AI-Generated Sleep StoriesarXiv cs.AI · November 2, 2026
- More Rules, Longer Lists? Benchmarking Self-Evolving Agents on a Hidden-Rule CurriculumarXiv cs.AI · November 2, 2026