Debate-to-Skill: Capability-Bound Process Supervision for Industrial Query-to-Agent Annotation
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2609.11176v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Industrial query-to-agent matching fails when topical relevance is mistaken for executable capability, especially on long-tail and boundary-sensitive requests. We formulate annotation as \emph{capability-bound process supervision} and instantiate it with Debate-to-Skill, which uses reusable decision principles, structured deliberation, verifier-based verdict extraction, and disagreement-driven refinement. On an industrial Query2Agent benchmark, we compare Debate-to-Skill with direct-label supervision, reasoning-SFT, and structural ablations. The results test whether gains come from supervising the capability-critical decision process itself, es
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- A Multi-Stage Rule-Chaining Framework for Compositional and Interpretable Cognitive ReasoningarXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026
- CryptoL: Towards Scale Dominance and Physics Constraints Mitigation in Financial Multivariate Time Series ForecastingarXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026
- Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM WorkflowsarXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026
- Agentic Share-of-Search: A Multi-Agent AI System for Competitive Decision-Making in LLM-Mediated E-CommercearXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026
- SemVerBench: Benchmarking LLM Comprehension of Version-Constraint Resolution SemanticsarXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026
- KuaiRP Series Role-playing Models Technical ReportarXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026