Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2609.11018v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both es
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
- Företag
Related AI news
- Nvidia in talks to invest $10b in Anthropic IPO: sourcesTech in Asia · September 12, 2026
- Sequoia leads Mecka AI round at nearly $500m valuationTech in Asia · September 12, 2026
- A Multi-Stage Rule-Chaining Framework for Compositional and Interpretable Cognitive ReasoningarXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026
- CryptoL: Towards Scale Dominance and Physics Constraints Mitigation in Financial Multivariate Time Series ForecastingarXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026
- Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM WorkflowsarXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026
- Agentic Share-of-Search: A Multi-Agent AI System for Competitive Decision-Making in LLM-Mediated E-CommercearXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026