Don't Pick a Winner: Knowledge Conflicts Need a Prior, Not a Rule
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.36169v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A retrieval-augmented language model answers from two sources, the retrieved context and its own knowledge, and the two disagree whenever the context is incomplete or wrong. Existing methods settle the disagreement with a rule fixed at design time: follow the context, amplify it in proportion to how far it moves the model, or trust the model's memory. Each rule is confidently wrong in some deployment. In a decision-theoretic model of two sources, the score of any fixed rule is linear in the share of reliable contexts while the best attainable score is convex, so every fixed rule is beaten wherever it is not exactly optimal; and a symmetric dive
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- Synopsys joins NUS consortium for AI cooling researchTech in Asia · October 28, 2026
- kw-bench: Breaking Frontier Harnesses on Real-World TasksarXiv cs.AI · October 28, 2026
- LM-DSB: A Lightweight Multi-agent System for Automated Daily Safety Bulletin Generation in ConstructionarXiv cs.AI · October 28, 2026
- Your Agent Acts Differently When You're Around: How User Presence Changes Agent Behavior in NegotiationarXiv cs.AI · October 28, 2026
- RouteDRAG: Learning to Route and Control Agentic Execution for Multimodal Document RAGarXiv cs.AI · October 28, 2026
- From Solver Trajectories to Teaching Trajectories: Cognition-Aligned Reasoning DistillationarXiv cs.AI · October 28, 2026