Dynamic Governance of Multi-LLM Agent Systems for Collaborative Conversational Outcomes
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2608.11207v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When two LLM agents with structurally opposed objectives interact across multiple turns, the absence of a shared goal function produces not competition but collapse: the visitor capitulates, the site agent stops varying its approach, and the conversation terminates without achieving either agent's stated objective. This paper asks whether a control-theoretic governance layer can substitute for that missing goal function. The Experience Orchestrator (EO) addresses this in a simulated financial services environment where a site agent guides a visitor toward advisor contact while the visitor maintains psychologically realistic resistance. EO gover
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- Rogue AI aren’t science fiction anymoreThe Verge AI · August 16, 2026
- When AI models aren't allowed to reflect on themselves, it changes their entire worldviewThe Decoder · August 16, 2026
- OpenAI dissolved the team built to catch catastrophic AI risks, reassigning its work to other groupsThe Decoder · August 16, 2026
- I gave Tencent’s WeChat AI agent control for 24 hours: where it excelled – and stumbledSCMP Tech · August 16, 2026
- Anthropic's bio-weapons filter was down for nearly a year, exposing 133 million requestsThe Decoder · August 16, 2026
- Optima tackles AI benchmarking's biggest flaw by letting users test models against their own dataThe Decoder · August 16, 2026