Fool's Gold: Defensive Deception Against Safety-Removal Attacks on Open-Weight Models
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2608.17202v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety alignment in open-weight language models is trivially removable: abliteration projects a refusal-mediating direction out of the weights in minutes, and no release-time defense we are aware of prevents it durably. What cannot be prevented can be deceived. Our defense, decoy hardening ("Fool's Gold"), concedes the refusal strip and poisons its payoff: once refusal is stripped, most answers to hazardous operational requests are confident, fluent decoys whose critical elements are falsified. Decoys are trained inside a differentiable simulation of the attack, expressing only in the attacked state; a refusal pin and benign leash hold clean-st
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- Depth Enables Local Entropy: Quadratic Depth Dependence in Deep Variation-Norm ReLU RegressionarXiv cs.AI · August 19, 2026
- Do LLMs Know a Good Hypothesis When They See One? Logit-Based Energy Scoring Outperforms Prompted LLM-as-Judge for Scientific Hypothesis RankingarXiv cs.AI · August 19, 2026
- KernelArc: A Multi-Agent Framework for GPU Kernel OptimizationarXiv cs.AI · August 19, 2026
- Synthesizing Feature Extractors: An Agentic Approach for Algorithm SelectionarXiv cs.AI · August 19, 2026
- PlanPO: Group Planning-Aware Policy Optimization for Multi-Turn Agentic LLMsarXiv cs.AI · August 19, 2026
- SkillEffect: Checked Lowering for Memory-Bounded Agent ToolsarXiv cs.AI · August 19, 2026