From Answers to Interpretations: Rethinking Ambiguity-Induced Aleatoric Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2609.04543v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A key challenge in reliable LLM deployment is recognizing when uncertainty reflects irreducible variability in the task rather than limitations in the model's knowledge. In language tasks, a central source of such aleatoric uncertainty is input ambiguity or underspecification, where multiple interpretations remain plausible. Existing decomposition methods estimate aleatoric uncertainty by generating multiple clarifications of the input, querying the model for an answer under each clarification, and comparing the resulting answers. We argue that answers are not necessary for identifying ambiguity: they are often redundant, add avoidable cost, an
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- Iris: Climbing to the Search FrontierarXiv cs.AI · September 7, 2026
- ResLearn-XR: Residual Learning for Network Traffic and Quality-of-Experience-Aware Modeling in Extended RealityarXiv cs.AI · September 7, 2026
- What Does Multi-Harness RL Learn? Credit Assignment and Portability in Coding AgentsarXiv cs.AI · September 7, 2026
- Does the Selected Object Reach the Reader? Auditing Identity Handoffs in Grounded Language-Model PipelinesarXiv cs.AI · September 7, 2026
- Harbor Adapters and Harbor-Index: Infrastructure and a Curated Meta-Dataset for Large-Scale Agentic EvaluationarXiv cs.AI · September 7, 2026
- PerfReasoning: How Well Do LLMs Reason on Hardware Performance?arXiv cs.AI · September 7, 2026