Frozen Scenes, Shifting Winners: Configuration Fragility in Text-to-3D Evaluation
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.00447v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Can a text-to-3D leaderboard change when every generated scene stays fixed? We audit this question for rendered-image evaluation, where camera settings and caption wording become part of the measurement protocol. Across 300 frozen scenes from six generators, we vary eight render and caption factors for 19 alignment evaluators plus one perceptual-quality control, then test four targeted scene degradations. Peak configuration variance exceeds between-generator variance for 17/19 alignment evaluators, with prompt-bootstrap lower bounds above 1 for 11/19. Rankings are more stable than scores, yet 18/19 evaluators change their point-estimate winner
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Bild
- Företag
Related AI news
- Characterizing a Configuration Where Inference-Time PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting Is Inert: Evidence from Three Reasoning LMsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Benchmarking Prompt Optimization of Large Language Models With ChessarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Measuring the Microtask Eligibility Gap: When Is an Off-the-Shelf SLM Enough for an Agent Harness?arXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Comedic Fool's Gold: Reward Exploits and Countermeasures in Conversational HumorarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Before Agents Decide: Epistemic Action in LLM-Based SystemsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Heavy-Tailed Memory Traces in Long-Horizon Language AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026