How Stable Are LLM-Generated Proofs Under Program Refactoring? A Stress Test for Verifiable Code Generation
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2610.36328v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmarks for verifiable code generation usually test a proof against one fixed implementation. We ask whether the same proof remains valid after a program refactoring that preserves behavior. We introduce RefactorProof, which derives 458 Lean-certified variants from the 185 VERINA tasks that compile in our pinned environment while holding the specification and evaluated proof fixed byte-for-byte. VERINA supplies reference proofs for 46 tasks, all from its basic split; the primary model-versus-reference comparisons further match on 21-25 short, non-recursive tasks. Structural refactorings expose substantial brittleness across proof sources: ta
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- Synopsys joins NUS consortium for AI cooling researchTech in Asia · October 28, 2026
- kw-bench: Breaking Frontier Harnesses on Real-World TasksarXiv cs.AI · October 28, 2026
- LM-DSB: A Lightweight Multi-agent System for Automated Daily Safety Bulletin Generation in ConstructionarXiv cs.AI · October 28, 2026
- Your Agent Acts Differently When You're Around: How User Presence Changes Agent Behavior in NegotiationarXiv cs.AI · October 28, 2026
- RouteDRAG: Learning to Route and Control Agentic Execution for Multimodal Document RAGarXiv cs.AI · October 28, 2026
- From Solver Trajectories to Teaching Trajectories: Cognition-Aligned Reasoning DistillationarXiv cs.AI · October 28, 2026