Inducing Reward-Free Judging Rubrics that Reduce Over-Crediting in Agent Evaluation

arXiv cs.AIAugust 17, 2026en

arXiv:2608.13564v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating language-model agents at scale increasingly relies on a second language model as an automatic judge, because the gold signal, an executable environment reward, is expensive, slow, or unavailable at deployment time. Such a judge is a reward-free proxy whose value depends on whether it can be trusted, yet existing judges either hand-write the scoring rubric, as in G-Eval, or fine-tune the judge's weights, and both tend to credit fluent but unsuccessful trajectories as successes. We instead induce the text of an agent-judging rubric from a small set of ground-truth-labeled trajectories, grounding it in true outcomes. We present RubricFo

This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.

• Forskning
• Agenter
• Företag