Invocation-Level Reliability of Tool-Using Agents
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2608.26189v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tool-using agents fail two ways: choosing the wrong tool, or forming wrong arguments, and an early failure of either kind can silently corrupt everything downstream. We measure a correct-invocation rate that separates the two, under both a clean teacher-forced context and the model's own free-running context, on five open-weight models over contamination-free multi-step tasks (depths 1-8). By depth 6, roughly 70% of a model's own clean-context capability is lost to its own earlier mistakes (L6 = 0.686, 0.684). Our central finding concerns the measurement itself. Under exact-match scoring against a fixed gold trajectory, a propagation model's se
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- SoftBank-backed surgical robotics firm eyes Hong Kong listing to power mainland China pushSCMP Tech · August 28, 2026
- Anthropic unveils new framework allowing AI agents to operate physical devicesEconomic Times Tech · August 28, 2026
- A Task-Centric Ontology and Deterministic Domain Rules as a Verifiable Core for AI-Assisted Chemistry Problem SolvingarXiv cs.AI · August 28, 2026
- The Artificial Experimentalist: Discovery and Control of Self-Organizing Phenomena with Autotelic Reinforcement LearningarXiv cs.AI · August 28, 2026
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Customer Churn Prediction in Telecommunications: A Framework for CRM IntegrationarXiv cs.AI · August 28, 2026
- A Safety-Gated Multimodal AI Backend for Mental-Health Support: Hierarchical State Representation, Conservative Risk Fusion, and Controlled Generation in AnianarXiv cs.AI · August 28, 2026