Knowing Whom to Trust is not Enough: The Trust--Agreement Gap in Repeated Multi-Party LLM Negotiation
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2610.31971v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly participate in negotiations on behalf of individuals and organizations, yet they remain vulnerable to manipulation, particularly in repeated multi-party interactions. Classical multi-agent systems address this challenge through explicit trust and reputation models, whereas existing work on LLM negotiation largely treats trust as an emergent phenomenon. We investigate whether LLM agents can form useful trust estimates from prior interactions and leverage them to improve future negotiation outcomes. We introduce a repeated, multi-party, multi-issue negotiation framework in which recurring agents part
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- Exclusive: Monzo founder Tom Blomfield backs AI agent startup Nous in $17m raiseSifted · October 26, 2026
- HSBC launches AI tool for corporate banking clientsTech in Asia · October 26, 2026
- A look at Toyota's robotics expansion, including its Walden spinoff and a $6.4B annual plan to deploy 400K factory robots, as it competes with Tesla and China (Financial Times)Techmeme · October 26, 2026
- Reproducible Evaluation as the Substrate for Safe Prompt Compression in Production AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026
- PaperFormalizer: Author-in-the-Loop Autoformalization of Research Papers in LeanarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026
- Don't Forget What You Just Learned: Self-Directed Repair Turns Agent Mistakes Into Lasting LessonsarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026