Language Is an Insufficient Substrate for Quantitative Reasoning, and Consequential Domains Need Large Quantitative Models
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2609.12105v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The prevailing assumption in applied machine learning is that progress on consequential quantitative decisions such as pricing risk, allocating capital, triaging patients, or containing a network intrusion will follow from progress in large language models (LLMs). A language model is trained on a representation of the world that was produced by human description; description is a lossy encoding of the quantitative record, and the loss is irreversible: no downstream model, at any scale, can recover from a description what the description did not encode. We formalize this as a property of the representation on which a model is trained rather than
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
Related AI news
- Sam Altman calls for pacing AI development but promises rapid progress will continueThe Decoder · September 14, 2026
- « Si Anthropic, OpenAI et xAI font une pause, la belle histoire boursière des fabricants de puces risque de s’enrayer »Le Monde Pixels · September 14, 2026
- OpenAI boss Sam Altman spells out how and why the AI industry wants to slow down: 'We could lose control'CNBC Technology · September 14, 2026
- iOS 27: Diese Features fehlen zum Start – neben Siri AIheise online – KI · September 14, 2026
- Samsung, SK Hynix reject US$19 billion power prepayment as Korea speeds chip expansionDIGITIMES · September 14, 2026
- How hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Google are siding with consumers on data center power costs and sweetening offers for communities to gain support (Ann Davis Vaughan/The Information)Techmeme · September 14, 2026