Learning When to Withdraw: Curriculum Coverage and Rule-Specific Failures in Fine-Tuned Language Agents
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.21045v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tool-using language agents must revise prepared actions when evidence changes or authority is revoked. Selective withdrawal means suspending affected actions, preserving supported work, and resuming only after sufficient repair. We study supervised fine-tuning in NAQD-Env, a synthetic environment with explicit dependencies and a deterministic reference policy. Four LoRA checkpoints of Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct compare an original curriculum with an enriched one, the latter under three system-prompt framings with identical views and targets. Three instruction-tuned baselines and all four checkpoints are evaluated under three inference prompts on fresh
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
- Reglering
Related AI news
- Nvidia launches open Nemotron model for enterprise AI agentsTech in Asia · October 16, 2026
- Europe’s AI fintech market mapped: 94 startups automating the business of moneySifted · October 16, 2026
- Suuryritykset hurahtivat uuteen ilmiöön – Kansainvälisen jätin johtaja kertoo, millaiset työntekijät pärjäävät jatkossaTivi · October 16, 2026
- Hong Kong vies for role in robotics boom with launch of embodied AI hubSCMP Tech · October 16, 2026
- IneqAgent: Agentic Inequality Proving in Lean with Symbolic ComputationarXiv cs.AI · October 16, 2026
- L2G-SR: Learning to Guide LLM-based Symbolic RegressionarXiv cs.AI · October 16, 2026