Leveraging Large Language Models for Systematic Literature Review of Disease Spread Models
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2608.26150v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new opportunities to streamline and potentially automate many research processes, including systematic literature reviews (SLRs). This study reports an LLM pipeline development for extracting model-relevant information from 536 peer-reviewed agent-based modeling papers. We compare the results with those of a human-conducted SLR. Our results show paper-level accuracies of approximately 77.95% for GPT-4.1 and 81.67% for GPT-5.0. Field-level accuracy ranges from 32.40% to 100.00%, with more complex or subjective fields performing less reliably. Importantly, we find that agreement bet
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- OpenAI
- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- Anthropic unveils new framework allowing AI agents to operate physical devicesEconomic Times Tech · August 28, 2026
- A Task-Centric Ontology and Deterministic Domain Rules as a Verifiable Core for AI-Assisted Chemistry Problem SolvingarXiv cs.AI · August 28, 2026
- The Artificial Experimentalist: Discovery and Control of Self-Organizing Phenomena with Autotelic Reinforcement LearningarXiv cs.AI · August 28, 2026
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Customer Churn Prediction in Telecommunications: A Framework for CRM IntegrationarXiv cs.AI · August 28, 2026
- A Safety-Gated Multimodal AI Backend for Mental-Health Support: Hierarchical State Representation, Conservative Risk Fusion, and Controlled Generation in AnianarXiv cs.AI · August 28, 2026
- Knowledge Cards: Structured Knowledge for AI SystemsarXiv cs.AI · August 28, 2026