LitReview Arena: Evaluating Literature Review Agents with Battle-Style Peer Review Platform
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2608.21374v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Literature reviews are essential to scientific progress, but rigorously evaluating automatically generated reviews remains difficult because many aspects of research utility depend on expert judgment rather than reference-overlap metrics. We introduce LitReview Arena, a battle-style evaluation platform with a structured protocol tailored to literature review quality: domain experts with AI paper-writing experience compare anonymized drafts, are matched to topics within their expertise, and provide dimension-wise outcomes over five literature-review-specific criteria. From this protocol, we collect approximately 3k expert judgments, each contain
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
- Företag
Related AI news
- AI chipmaker Enflame sets subscription date for near $900 million Shanghai IPOEconomic Times Tech · August 25, 2026
- Measuring Activation Control in Large Language ModelsarXiv cs.AI · August 25, 2026
- KVBoost: Chunk-Level Key-Value Cache Reuse with Deviation-Guided Recomputation for Efficient Large Language Model InferencearXiv cs.AI · August 25, 2026
- AIREP: A Protocol for Per-Decision Evidence in AI Runtime GovernancearXiv cs.AI · August 25, 2026
- SchemaRouter: Field-Aware Tool Routing for Efficient Heterogeneous Agentic RAGarXiv cs.AI · August 25, 2026
- There Is No Neutral Harness: Modern LLM Leaderboards Are Manufactured by Config-Fragile ItemsarXiv cs.AI · August 25, 2026