LLMs Are Not (Consistently) Bayesian: Quantifying Internal (In)consistencies of LLMs’ Probabilistic Beliefs
Apple Machine Learningen
Apple Machine Learning
AI Global WireModern AI systems are being deployed in complex domains such as medicine, science, and law, where there is often not a single correct answer given the observed evidence. Such systems must be able to represent and update uncertain beliefs about the world as new evidence arrives to make rational decisions. We introduce the novel technique of studying LLMs as information processing rules and utilize the information processing gap—the deviation from Bayes updates—to study the internal (in)consistencies of how LLMs update their probabilistic beliefs from evidence. Our extensive experiments evaluate…
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by Apple Machine Learning — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at Apple Machine Learning- Forskning
- Reglering
Related AI news
- China-linked bots amplified real U.S. anger over AI data centersAxios · August 28, 2026
- China is secretly fueling America's data center rageAxios · August 28, 2026
- AI Has Human Doctors Asking: What’s Left for Us?WIRED AI · August 28, 2026
- 91% of professionals say their firm still falls short on AI - how to fix thatZDNET AI · August 28, 2026
- Anthropic gets its first court win over the Pentagon’s supply-chain risk labelTechCrunch AI · August 28, 2026
- U.S. court rules Pentagon's blacklisting of Anthropic was unlawfulThe Decoder · August 28, 2026