Looped Language Models Improve Compositional Tool Calling
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2608.18171v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Looped language models have shown promising results on reasoning benchmarks, yet their potential for agentic tool use remains largely unexplored. We study this question in compositional tool-calling settings, where models must coordinate multiple API calls, maintain intermediate state, and preserve dependencies across tool interactions. We evaluate native and retrofitted looped language models on API-Bank, BFCL, and NESTful, comparing looped and non-looped models trained under matched supervised fine-tuning recipes and varying recurrent depth at inference time. In controlled experiments, recurrent computation generally benefits compositional an
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- How Unitree's Go series, which helped the company dominate the quadruped robot market, drew on openly published US university research funded by the US military (Michael Martina/Reuters)Techmeme · August 20, 2026
- Optimized Fuzzy Logic Approach with the IEEE Key Gas Method for Diagnosing Power Transformer Faults Using Dissolved Gas AnalysisarXiv cs.AI · August 20, 2026
- Position: Profiling Game Worlds by Transition ComplexityarXiv cs.AI · August 20, 2026
- SESSE: Sketch, Expand, Sort, Summarize, Evaluate -- LLM-as-Judge Evaluation via Structured DecompositionarXiv cs.AI · August 20, 2026
- Measuring the Partial-Credit Gap: A Strict Benchmark on Vietnam's 2025 Convex Marking SchemearXiv cs.AI · August 20, 2026
- FinSkillBench: Evaluating AI Agents and Domain Skills for Investment ManagementarXiv cs.AI · August 20, 2026