Measuring Model-Specific Alignment Drift in LLM-Based Opinion Dynamics
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2611.03980v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly used as synthetic participants in opinion-dynamics experiments, often assuming that an agent's behaviour is fully determined by its prompt. We test this assumption with a framework in which LLM agents discuss a contested policy issue over repeated rounds while their stance is quantified by a fixed psychometric instrument independent of any dynamics model. Across six LLMs, committed personas are intrinsically stable: in each of the five models tested without peer input, every agent keeps its assigned side for 20 rounds. The observed loss of alignment under discussion is therefore interaction-ind
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
- Reglering
Related AI news
- IndiaAI Mission's three indigenous AI models target offline mobile access, secure use in critical sectorsEconomic Times Tech · November 4, 2026
- Reasoning is topologically simplearXiv cs.AI · November 4, 2026
- A Guideline-Grounded Multi-Agent Framework for Personalized Exercise Prescription from Clinical and Wearable DataarXiv cs.AI · November 4, 2026
- Thinking Fast, Trading Late: System One Decision Models vs the MarketarXiv cs.AI · November 4, 2026
- ROCm InferaSim: Cut LLM Serving Trial Costs and Deploy the Best ConfigurationarXiv cs.AI · November 4, 2026
- CARD: A Proof-Carrying Certificate-to-Action Interface for Relative-Measurement GraphsarXiv cs.AI · November 4, 2026