Open-ended Scientific Discovery with Possibilistic Reasoning
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.11289v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous scientific discovery with LLMs requires generating and testing hypotheses adaptively as evidence accumulates while maintaining statistical validity. Existing anytime-valid methods can handle data-dependent hypotheses, but open-ended discovery poses a deeper challenge: the best discovered hypothesis may still be the best of a bad lot, with better explanations yet undiscovered, while even background knowledge such as physical laws may require revision in light of new findings. In response, we formalize the problem as Abductive Autonomous Scientific Discovery (AASD) using possibility theory. We introduce abductive utility, a computable
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Reglering
Related AI news
- Anthropic is setting up a "presidential engagement" program for the 2028 US elections that will offer AI policy education to candidates in both parties (Emily Forlini/Fortune)Techmeme · October 9, 2026
- On the Clock: Towards Punctual and Productive Time-Budgeted AI AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 9, 2026
- How Narrative Wrapping Affects LLM Refusal: A Cross-Language Benchmark and DefensearXiv cs.AI · October 9, 2026
- Curating Always-Loaded Context for LLM Agents: A Capacitated Assortment Model with Censored FeedbackarXiv cs.AI · October 9, 2026
- AgentHorizon: Evaluating Agentic Judges for Long-Horizon Computer-Use TasksarXiv cs.AI · October 9, 2026
- When Lower Reconstruction Loss Hurts: Distributionally Robust Refinement for Low-Bit LLM QuantizationarXiv cs.AI · October 9, 2026