Open-Endedness Bench: Measuring Epistemic Process from Agent Records
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2610.02588v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agents are increasingly given open-ended research tasks: discovering an empirical law from self-designed experiments, improving a heuristic whose optimum nobody knows, or beating a standing record. Their execution logs record every step of this research, yet the runs are still judged by their outcome score. That score alone does not establish whether an agent's claims follow from executed experiments, and a reference answer may be unavailable. We evaluate the agent's epistemic process: how it forms hypotheses, tests them, and revises them in response to evidence. We introduce OEB (Open-Endedness Bench), a benchmark-agnostic methodology that rea
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Agenter
- Reglering
Related AI news
- Bessent expects US-China AI incident channel as Washington leans on voluntary oversightDIGITIMES · October 5, 2026
- Montag: VW-Partner für autonomes Fahren, Fertiger-Druck auf Notebook-Anbieterheise online – KI · October 5, 2026
- DeepSeek Harness challenges Agent lock-in with Claude Code Mods bridge and open plugin architectureDIGITIMES · October 5, 2026
- The AI Risk Observatory: What Can We Learn from AI Disclosures in Annual Reports About Societal Resilience?arXiv cs.AI · October 5, 2026
- DeReAct: Decomposed Reasoning and Acting for Reliable AI AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 5, 2026
- World Action Modeling with Progressive Visual PlanningarXiv cs.AI · October 5, 2026