Optimal Correction Sets for Provable Redress of Contestable Causal Discovery
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2610.33138v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Constraint-based causal discovery relies on conditional-independence (CI) tests that may conflict in finite samples, leaving no causal graph that satisfies them all. Causal Assumption-based Argumentation (ABA) makes these tests explicit as defeasible commitments, and offers correspondence guarantees with a subset of them, but its existing repair procedure releases facts heuristically and offers no formal response to a user's contestation of a release. We argue that contestable causal discovery requires an inspectable repair object, a justification for it, and a predictable revision procedure for such contestations. We therefore formulate CI-fac
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- ByteDance accelerates robotics commercialisation with new recruitment driveSCMP Tech · October 28, 2026
- PFNの国産フラグシップモデル「PLaMo 3.1 Prime」発表 オンプレでDeep Research対応 API無料プランも開始ITmedia AI+ · October 28, 2026
- Robinhood CEO’s AI startup Harmonic expands into chip designTech in Asia · October 28, 2026
- Blume Ventures leads $15m round for healthtech startup CentTech in Asia · October 28, 2026
- US robotics startup Physical Intelligence eyes $20b valuationTech in Asia · October 28, 2026
- PFNの国産フラッグシップモデル「PLaMo 3.1 Prime」発表 オンプレでDeep Research対応 API無料プランも開始ITmedia AI+ · October 28, 2026