PersonaScienceBench: Evaluating Scientific Agents with Diverse Simulated Researchers
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2610.32106v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific agents collaborate with researchers whose expertise and preferences differ, but benchmarks usually hold the collaborator fixed. We introduce PersonaScienceBench: 200 tasks from five benchmarks across four scientific domains. Simulated researchers provide context and feedback according to persona profiles, while task objectives and grading remain fixed. Agents encounter researcher preferences only through conversation. Across eighteen modelconfigurations, task performance, fact recovery, and self-repetition reveal different strengths. Detailed GPT 6 Astra analyses show distinct agent responses across researcher profiles; interaction t
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- Exclusive: Monzo founder Tom Blomfield backs AI agent startup Nous in $17m raiseSifted · October 26, 2026
- A look at Toyota's robotics expansion, including its Walden spinoff and a $6.4B annual plan to deploy 400K factory robots, as it competes with Tesla and China (Financial Times)Techmeme · October 26, 2026
- Evidence-Grounded SLM Behavioral Prediction Architecture for Future Assistance UsearXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026
- Tradeoff-Aware Territory Design: A Multi-Objective Decision System for Enterprise Customer-to-Seller AllocationarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026
- Phronix: The Capability-Centric Learning Paradigm for AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026
- Patronizing and Condescending Language Detection in English and MandarinarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026