Position: AI Leaderboards Are Underserving the Global South: A Case Study from India
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2608.18117v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This position paper argues that AI leaderboards are structurally ill-suited to serving the Global South because they lack independent governance, conflict-of-interest policies, and mechanisms for metric evolution. The barrier is not missing data; high-quality regional benchmarks already exist: IndicSUPERB, MILU, and LAHAJA for India; IrokoBench for Africa; AlGhafa for Arabic. The barrier is institutional design. Global leaderboards do not include these benchmarks, and no governance mechanism compels them to do so. Commercial pressure corrects leaderboard failures when paying customers in the Global North are affected. The Global South lacks equ
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- How Unitree's Go series, which helped the company dominate the quadruped robot market, drew on openly published US university research funded by the US military (Michael Martina/Reuters)Techmeme · August 20, 2026
- Governance Records as Supervision: Verifier-Selected Self-Training for Structured Workflow RepairarXiv cs.AI · August 20, 2026
- Position: Profiling Game Worlds by Transition ComplexityarXiv cs.AI · August 20, 2026
- Optimized Fuzzy Logic Approach with the IEEE Key Gas Method for Diagnosing Power Transformer Faults Using Dissolved Gas AnalysisarXiv cs.AI · August 20, 2026
- SESSE: Sketch, Expand, Sort, Summarize, Evaluate -- LLM-as-Judge Evaluation via Structured DecompositionarXiv cs.AI · August 20, 2026
- Measuring the Partial-Credit Gap: A Strict Benchmark on Vietnam's 2025 Convex Marking SchemearXiv cs.AI · August 20, 2026