RippleCP: Measuring Counterfactual Checkpoint Advantage in Coding Agents
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.09088v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent checkpoint systems decide what state is recovery-relevant, how to snapshot it, and whether rollback is admissible. None decides which of the safe boundaries they expose are worth materializing. We formulate this as counterfactual checkpoint advantage, the reduction in future recovery cost obtained by checkpointing a candidate rather than skipping it, and measure it by driving a CP branch and a SKIP branch to the same logical failure and recovering both under matched model, tool, verifier, and stopping conditions. On a frozen pilot of 12 SWE-bench Verified tasks and 106 real recovery branches, checkpointing saves 49.4 s per task, and that
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- Hanmi wins rare Samsung order amid US$5 billion chip substrate expansionDIGITIMES · October 8, 2026
- Singapore teams with Penn lab on resilient military robotsTech in Asia · October 8, 2026
- US venture deal value reaches record $515.8B as exits fail to keep paceSiliconANGLE · October 8, 2026
- How Fragile Is On-Device Language Model Safety? Localizing Safety-Critical Parameters for Sparse Fault AnalysisarXiv cs.AI · October 8, 2026
- When the Governor Becomes the Disturbance: Control-Generated Disturbance and Cost-Aware Backoff in Governed Tool-Using AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 8, 2026
- GeoNatureAgent (GNA): A Framework and Benchmark for Pre-Production Evaluation of Tool-Using Agents on Geospatial and Environmental TasksarXiv cs.AI · October 8, 2026