Scientific Agents: Evaluating Profession-Specific System Prompts on Scientific Tasks
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.00084v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Detailed profession-specific system prompts raise token use and estimated cost per response without a consistent accuracy gain. We evaluate Scientific Agents, an open-source corpus of 503 profession-specific AGENTS.md profiles, with Gemini 3.8 Flash via OpenRouter in the Pi agent harness. We compare matched profiles with four controls: a minimal baseline ("You are a helpful assistant"), the profile's opening role sentence, a generic scientific rigor guide, and a profile from an unrelated domain. Across nine text-based science benchmarks (4,531 sampled questions, 100 matched profiles), 4,488 items completed all five conditions after API-error re
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- AutoSynthData: Generating Training Data for Enterprise AgentsHugging Face · October 2, 2026
- Characterizing a Configuration Where Inference-Time PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting Is Inert: Evidence from Three Reasoning LMsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Benchmarking Prompt Optimization of Large Language Models With ChessarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Measuring the Microtask Eligibility Gap: When Is an Off-the-Shelf SLM Enough for an Agent Harness?arXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Comedic Fool's Gold: Reward Exploits and Countermeasures in Conversational HumorarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Before Agents Decide: Epistemic Action in LLM-Based SystemsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026