Text, Pixels, or Both? Evaluating Input Representations for Multimodal Document QA
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2609.22628v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Every document QA system begins with a choice that is rarely studied on its own: whether to feed the model page images, extracted text, or both. We isolate this choice, holding the prompt, judge, and scoring pipeline fixed, across four commercial model endpoints, two corpora, and two context regimes (gold evidence pages and the full document). On documents that fit the image budget, page images lead on accuracy at every document length on both corpora, but this advantage carries a growing latency and cost premium: text latency stays roughly flat as documents lengthen while image latency rises steadily. Text and images also fail on different que
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Bild
Related AI news
- Do Existing Preconditioners Improve Biomedical Tabular Foundation Learning? An Empirical Study on TabPFN OptimizationarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- 4DGS-JEPA: Temporally Compositional Joint-Embedding Prediction for Dynamic Gaussian SplattingarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- An Accurate and Interpretable Hyper Graph Neural Network for GBM Survival PredictionarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- Ovis-Embedding: Pushing the Frontiers of Universal Omni-Modal EmbeddingsarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- X-Planner: Event-Structured Task Planning for Embodied IntelligencearXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- Lean Pool: An AI-Maintained Archive of Formalized MathematicsarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026