The Answer Is Not the Argument
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2609.00264v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chain-of-thought monitoring is proposed for AI oversight, yet evaluations often provide monitors with a trusted reference answer. We ask whether answer access improves reasoning verification or mainly exposes incorrect conclusions. We collected 237 step-numbered solutions to 79 Humanity's Last Exam physics questions from three frontier models, with no inserted errors, and independently labelled final-answer correctness and the first false step. The reference standard combined physicist annotations, an independent LLM debate, and source-masked adjudication. This yielded 24 critical traces in which the answer was correct but the trace contained a
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Företag
Related AI news
- Chinese chipmaker Enflame 4,073 times oversubscribed in Shanghai IPO amid Nvidia raceSCMP Tech · September 3, 2026
- Beyond Outcome Gaps: Process-Aware Fairness Diagnosis for LLM-based Multi-Agent Decision SystemsarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- MASkills: Continual Skills Optimization for Multi-Agent LLM SystemsarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- FUSE: An Evaluating Framework for Dangerous Capabilities of LLMsarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- Looped Transformers under the Jacobian Lens: Does the Global Workspace Survive Recurrence?arXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- When Can a Machine Trust a Statute? A Survival Certificate for Machine-Extracted Legal LogicarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026