The LLM Proposes, the Executive Disposes: A Self-Verifying Agent Instrument that Dissociates Commitment Drift from Binding Drift in Long-Horizon Agents
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2608.04066v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How do you verify a long-horizon agent when its own state and self-reports are exactly what you cannot trust? We present an agent instrument built so that verification is structural rather than post-hoc. A deterministic Executive owns all belief; a language model may only file typed proposals, and a claim is admitted only when a prediction pre-registered before acting is matched against observation by code. Two properties make the instrument a verifier of its own science, not just of the agent: every run invalidates itself when per-organ write-error, render-size, or salted-canary-echo floors are breached (four of the first eight architecture ru
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- PitchBook: AI voice startups raised $7B in Q1 '26, vs. $1B in Q1 '25, as OpenAI and Google bet on voice as the main interface for a new generation of AI agents (Cristina Criddle/Financial Times)Techmeme · August 6, 2026
- AI-agenter blir allt bättre på it-drift, men behöver mänsklig hjälpComputer Sweden · August 6, 2026
- Anthropic and OpenAI Agents in soup againEconomic Times Tech · August 6, 2026
- Donnerstag: Aus für Google Assistant, Snapchat-Verbot von KI-Videosheise online – KI · August 6, 2026
- Improving Auto-Design of Neural PDE Solvers with a Domain-Specific LanguagearXiv cs.AI · August 6, 2026
- FinProBench: Evaluating Financial AI Agents with Role-Grounded Rubrics Derived from Professional DeliverablesarXiv cs.AI · August 6, 2026