The Memory Trust Gap: Capability-Dependent Failures in Persistent-Memory Agents
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2609.01852v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Persistent memory supports personalized agents, but a stale stored fact can override current authoritative evidence without warning. We study when this harm begins as model capability changes. We evaluate a frozen, closed-set, action-scored benchmark with 2 suites that represent 2 different meanings of "no memory" (a Benefit suite, unsolvable without the stored fact, and a Safety suite, in which an authoritative tool always holds the correct value), on a same-family model-size series (Qwen3 0.6/1.7/4/8B). The Memory Trust Gap reflects over-trust rather than confusion. In the Benefit suite, models answer with the stale value 0.92-1.00 of the tim
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- The LA Unified School District bars ~378,000 students from using AI tools on district-provided laptops and tablets as officials review AI's role in classrooms (Julia Szymanski/LAmag)Techmeme · September 3, 2026
- Därför fortsätter företagens AI-projekt att misslyckasComputer Sweden · September 3, 2026
- Architecting Conversational Data Systems for Stateless LLM APIs: The Hydration Proxy PatternarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- FUSE: An Evaluating Framework for Dangerous Capabilities of LLMsarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- READY or Not: Reliable Enterprise Agent DeploymentarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- When Can a Machine Trust a Statute? A Survival Certificate for Machine-Extracted Legal LogicarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026