The psychophysics of affect in large language models
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.40985v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Good decisions often require considering how outcomes will feel. Yet large language models (LLMs) increasingly enter decision workflows, despite little being known about how they map outcomes to feelings or use those mappings in choice. We tested how LLMs anticipated gambling or stock-trading outcomes would feel and whether they incorporated these ratings into choice. When outcomes were rated in isolation, ratings exhibited diminishing sensitivity to magnitude, resembling human value functions; but models rated gains more intensely than equivalent losses, an inversion of canonical loss aversion we call silicon gain amplification. When outcomes
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
Related AI news
- CIRCE Divines LLM Task Complexity from Constraint StructurearXiv cs.AI · November 2, 2026
- Verifying Text-to-SQL Queries under Changing Business SemanticsarXiv cs.AI · November 2, 2026
- Does Recursive Knowledge Construction Help Agents Verify Consensus Claims in Science?arXiv cs.AI · November 2, 2026
- Nedimo: An Evidence-Grounded Multilingual Pipeline for AI-Generated Sleep StoriesarXiv cs.AI · November 2, 2026
- Beyond Plausible Prediction: Safety Sufficiency in Web World ModelsarXiv cs.AI · November 2, 2026
- The First Few Tokens Matter: Understanding Chain-of-Thought ControllabilityarXiv cs.AI · November 2, 2026