The Wisdom of Artificial Deliberative Crowds
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2609.22497v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The aggregation of many lay estimates often outperforms individual expert judgment, a phenomenon known as the wisdom of crowds. While this is usually attributed to the independence of estimates, an even stronger effect arises through deliberation: averaging the consensus estimates of small deliberating groups outperforms the classical wisdom of crowds, with individual judgments themselves also becoming more accurate after deliberation. Whether these improvements transfer to large language models deliberating amongst themselves is unknown. Here we adapt a three-stage deliberation paradigm previously used with human participants for use with larg
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- Do Existing Preconditioners Improve Biomedical Tabular Foundation Learning? An Empirical Study on TabPFN OptimizationarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- 4DGS-JEPA: Temporally Compositional Joint-Embedding Prediction for Dynamic Gaussian SplattingarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- An Accurate and Interpretable Hyper Graph Neural Network for GBM Survival PredictionarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- Ovis-Embedding: Pushing the Frontiers of Universal Omni-Modal EmbeddingsarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- X-Planner: Event-Structured Task Planning for Embodied IntelligencearXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- Lean Pool: An AI-Maintained Archive of Formalized MathematicsarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026