To Manipulate or Not: Opinion Dynamics in LLM Interactions
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.28875v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models increasingly take part in extended conversations where they can both shape and be shaped by another party's views, yet most persuasion research measures only one side of that exchange. We introduce a controlled LLM-LLM debate framework in which two language-model roles repeatedly discuss a contested topic (climate-change attribution): one is given an assigned stance and, in some conditions, an explicit instruction to persuade, while the other receives no assigned position. Across four ordered model combinations involving GPT-6 Luna and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, we track both each role's explicitly reported position and a sepa
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- OpenAI
- Verktyg
- Forskning
Related AI news
- OpenAI acquires Orchestra Bio to advance AI drug developmentDIGITIMES · October 22, 2026
- 奧特曼共同創辦 World 推出金融業真人驗證方案,Zoom 全面上線深偽偵測TechNews (TW) · October 22, 2026
- DiffResearch: Accelerating Deep Research with Diffusion Language ModelsarXiv cs.AI · October 22, 2026
- Does Every Instance Count Equally? Order Effects in LLM Multi-Instance ProcessingarXiv cs.AI · October 22, 2026
- GRAM: Group-wise Rank-Aware Model Merging via Subspace AlignmentarXiv cs.AI · October 22, 2026
- Simply Logical -- The First Three DecadesarXiv cs.AI · October 22, 2026