ToolGate: An Executable Acceptance Pipeline for Tool-Dependent Scientific Benchmark Construction
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2609.02067v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific benchmarks are commonly built by domain experts who write tasks and cross-check one another's work, or who adapt existing material from textbooks, published papers, and online resources. These routes can produce strong evaluations, but they require substantial per-item labor. Language models can reduce this repeated work by proposing candidates quickly. The remaining problem is acceptance. We target scientific questions whose answers require computations with specialist software rather than unaided reasoning alone. A candidate is invalid if its script fails or returns a different answer, or trivial if a model answers it without the s
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Företag
Related AI news
- The LA Unified School District bars ~378,000 students from using AI tools on district-provided laptops and tablets as officials review AI's role in classrooms (Julia Szymanski/LAmag)Techmeme · September 3, 2026
- Architecting Conversational Data Systems for Stateless LLM APIs: The Hydration Proxy PatternarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- FUSE: An Evaluating Framework for Dangerous Capabilities of LLMsarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- READY or Not: Reliable Enterprise Agent DeploymentarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- When Can a Machine Trust a Statute? A Survival Certificate for Machine-Extracted Legal LogicarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- Induction and Inquiry via Probabilistic Reasoning over Language and CodearXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026