Tunable Tool-Call Rates in LLM Agents via Representation Steering
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2608.25198v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deciding whether to call a tool is a core competence of an LLM agent, and a costly one to get wrong: needless calls add latency, accrue cost, and may trigger irreversible side effects, while missing calls leave the model confidently wrong on questions it could only answer through tool-calls. Models manage this balance poorly, both over-using and under-using tools. Existing methods such as post-training and prompt engineering are expensive and difficult to modify at inference time. We show that whether an instruction-tuned model calls a tool can be controlled by a single linear direction in its residual stream, extracted without any training fro
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- US judge blocks Pentagon's Anthropic blacklistingEconomic Times Tech · August 28, 2026
- Lam Research breaks ground on Oregon lab expansion for AI chip developmentDIGITIMES · August 28, 2026
- Anthropic opens research preview of hardware standard for AI agentsDIGITIMES · August 28, 2026
- Workday says Taiwan and Hong Kong firms lag in AI workflow integrationDIGITIMES · August 28, 2026
- Marvell raises its outlook twice in two quarters as custom silicon, scale-up optics broadenDIGITIMES · August 28, 2026
- Marvell’s stock sinks despite earnings beat and strong guidanceSiliconANGLE · August 28, 2026