Understanding Communication Failures in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.32060v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent LLM systems aim to improve reasoning through debate, evidence sharing, and mutual correction, but interaction can also introduce failures that final accuracy alone cannot explain. Agents may converge too early, ignore dissent, suppress correct minority answers, or preserve a wrong framing across rounds. We present a corpus-grounded taxonomy of communication failures, built from 3,211 failed multi-round trajectories across medical QA, coding, finance, multi-hop reasoning, ethics, and embodied text tasks. Using this taxonomy, we analyze failure distributions across datasets and system designs, round-level error dynamics, recovery hard
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- Exclusive: Monzo founder Tom Blomfield backs AI agent startup Nous in $17m raiseSifted · October 26, 2026
- A look at Toyota's robotics expansion, including its Walden spinoff and a $6.4B annual plan to deploy 400K factory robots, as it competes with Tesla and China (Financial Times)Techmeme · October 26, 2026
- Evidence-Grounded SLM Behavioral Prediction Architecture for Future Assistance UsearXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026
- Tradeoff-Aware Territory Design: A Multi-Objective Decision System for Enterprise Customer-to-Seller AllocationarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026
- Phronix: The Capability-Centric Learning Paradigm for AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026
- Patronizing and Condescending Language Detection in English and MandarinarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026