Verifiable Efficiency Limits of Innate LLM Planning in Sliding Puzzles
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.36415v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tool-assisted planning success can reflect external search and verification, leaving a model's unaided planning ability unresolved. We isolate innate planning through complete plans generated in one response without tools or execution feedback. We propose a verifiable framework that decomposes success-weighted plan efficiency as $\mathrm{SPE}=R\times Q\times E$: execution reliability, planning coordination among legal plans, and action economy among completed plans. Trajectory replay and certified optima verify these factors; the joint score includes unsuccessful attempts. We evaluate 8,400 full-plan outputs from seven model conditions on $4\ti
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
Related AI news
- Oracle's Larry Ellison dismisses 'SaaS apocalypse' fears, says AI will make software betterEconomic Times Tech · October 28, 2026
- Synopsys joins NUS consortium for AI cooling researchTech in Asia · October 28, 2026
- kw-bench: Breaking Frontier Harnesses on Real-World TasksarXiv cs.AI · October 28, 2026
- LM-DSB: A Lightweight Multi-agent System for Automated Daily Safety Bulletin Generation in ConstructionarXiv cs.AI · October 28, 2026
- Your Agent Acts Differently When You're Around: How User Presence Changes Agent Behavior in NegotiationarXiv cs.AI · October 28, 2026
- RouteDRAG: Learning to Route and Control Agentic Execution for Multimodal Document RAGarXiv cs.AI · October 28, 2026