What Do We Expect from LLMs? Mapping the Design of LLM Benchmarks
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2609.19182v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmarks are central to how progress in large language models (LLMs) is assessed and communicated. Yet model rankings alone reveal little about how evaluation requirements themselves are changing. The expanding variety of benchmarks offers another perspective: what researchers expect LLMs to do, and what they count as successful performance. We systematically map 14,767 papers introducing or updating evaluation resources from arXiv submissions between January 2022 and August 2026. Using staged screening and automated full-text coding, we examine changes in target systems and domains, evaluation materials and conditions, and scoring mechanisms
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Företag
Related AI news
- Security researchers in an OpenAI bug bounty program hacked OpenAI, accessing its "monorepo" on GitHub, using a cybersecurity version of Opus 4.8 and Opus 5 (Robert McMillan/Wall Street Journal)Techmeme · September 18, 2026
- Zero trust har ett stort AI-problemComputer Sweden · September 18, 2026
- What Do Current Systematic Generalization Tasks Miss? A Reasoning-Centered AnalysisarXiv cs.AI · September 18, 2026
- Do AI Agents Understand Computer Architecture?arXiv cs.AI · September 18, 2026
- Self Improvement via Fast Tree-searcharXiv cs.AI · September 18, 2026
- When Hiring Becomes Agent-Mediated: Evaluating Access and Recurrence in Two-Agent R\'esum\'e ScreeningarXiv cs.AI · September 18, 2026