What Should an Agent Remember? Disentangling Retention from Retrieval in Bounded-Memory Evaluation
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.00366v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A persistent agent must decide both what to retain as information arrives and what to surface once a query appears, yet memory evaluations can confound these decisions by comparing methods that differ in both retention and selection. We build a streaming-recall benchmark crossing retention and selection rules and evaluate every condition on the same 300 seeded episodes. Holding access fixed, query-aware selection improves required-fact recall by 15.5 percentage points (95% CI: 12.8 to 18.2), whereas a mixed comparison that also changes history access reports a 68.7-point advantage, of which 53.2 points are attributable to access. Under bounded
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
- Företag
Related AI news
- LG Uplus, OptAI team up on AI token optimizationTech in Asia · October 2, 2026
- AutoSynthData: Generating Training Data for Enterprise AgentsHugging Face · October 2, 2026
- Characterizing a Configuration Where Inference-Time PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting Is Inert: Evidence from Three Reasoning LMsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Benchmarking Prompt Optimization of Large Language Models With ChessarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Measuring the Microtask Eligibility Gap: When Is an Off-the-Shelf SLM Enough for an Agent Harness?arXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Comedic Fool's Gold: Reward Exploits and Countermeasures in Conversational HumorarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026