What the Trace Shows and What the Label Says: Auditing Behavioral Detectors in Agent Evaluation
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.30491v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents are often evaluated by reducing execution traces to labels such as final-answer correctness, tool verification, and fault propagation. These labels are measurements produced by parsers, behavioral detectors, and harness rules, and they may not fully capture what the trace shows. We study this in a tool-use setting built on GSM8K, where agents call a calculator whose outputs are occasionally corrupted, giving clear ground truth for what the tool returned, what the model later used, and what the detectors reported. We audit three trace-level detectors across six production models and 30 problems per model. Final correctness, visible re
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
- Företag
Related AI news
- Chinese state media: DeepSeek and MiniMax completed registration and won approval to open-source and deploy AI models overseas under proposed export controls (Bloomberg)Techmeme · October 23, 2026
- SK Hynix says its SSD subsidiary Solidigm has halted a review of a potential US IPO to fund a new US chip fab, citing "market conditions and share price trends" (P.R. Venkat/Wall Street Journal)Techmeme · October 23, 2026
- SK Hynix shares rebound after initial drop on scrapped Solidigm IPO plansCNBC Technology · October 23, 2026
- RoleFlow: Self-Evolving Multi-Role Agentic Collaboration via Structural AdaptationarXiv cs.AI · October 23, 2026
- Soft Ontology Priors over Latent Concept Posteriors for Weakly Supervised Neuro-Symbolic LearningarXiv cs.AI · October 23, 2026
- When Stable and Preferred Semantics Agree: A Path-Based ApproacharXiv cs.AI · October 23, 2026