When Does Information Sharing Improve Decentralized Discovery? Aggregation, Independent Rescue, and Equilibrium Selection
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2609.01814v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Information sharing can improve a pooled estimate while eliminating independent rescue actions. This paper separates those effects in exact finite discovery models. A centralized action-budget profile shows that equal one-person accuracy can coexist with different portfolio values. Under a registered incremental-sharing protocol, a sharing step improves discovery exactly when pooled residual error contracts faster than an independent rescue attempt. Exact bounded registries exhibit compression, aggregation, neutral curves, and a bounded zero mixed class. In a two-agent Bayesian game with a hidden mixture of common and independent signal sources
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- Därför fortsätter företagens AI-projekt att misslyckasComputer Sweden · September 3, 2026
- Architecting Conversational Data Systems for Stateless LLM APIs: The Hydration Proxy PatternarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- FUSE: An Evaluating Framework for Dangerous Capabilities of LLMsarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- READY or Not: Reliable Enterprise Agent DeploymentarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- When Can a Machine Trust a Statute? A Survival Certificate for Machine-Extracted Legal LogicarXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026
- Induction and Inquiry via Probabilistic Reasoning over Language and CodearXiv cs.AI · September 3, 2026